PBS Stations Weigh Loss of Affiliation Over Religious Content – washingtonpost.com
But I don’t believe for a second that it will.
Pages
Archives
- November 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
- July 2002
- June 2002
- May 2002
- April 2002
- March 2002
- February 2002
- January 2002
- December 2001
Lawson said her station has never had a complaint about its Mass broadcasts, either. But the program has sparked interest from other religious groups that would like the station to broadcast their church or mosque services, she said. “We just have to tell them that ['Mass for Shut-Ins'] is a legacy program, and that we don’t have the wherewithal or inclination to do any more,” she said.
A legacy program. Well, there you have it.
What the aitch is a “legacy program?”
You know. A legacy. Like how you get dullard white kids into the elite schools their grandparents went to, or unattractive girls into the sororities their pretty mothers, who married money, pledged.
(Sorry, I’m reading Tom Wolfe and it always makes me especially nasty.)
Tom is always spot on when lampooning the so-called upper class. Hunter S. Thompson, likewise.